Abhisit, Jatuporn in stalemate over libel lawsuit | Bangkok Post: breakingnews

Abhisit, Jatuporn in legal stalemate

Published: 9 Mar 2013 at 07.50
Online news:

Former prime minister Abhisit Vejjajiva and red-shirt United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD) core member Jatuporn Prompan walked away from an out of-court settlement over a libel lawsuit on Friday.

Mr Abhisit had filed a defamation charge against Mr Jatuporn, whom he said had falsely accused him of ordering the killing of anti-government protesters in April and May 2010.

Jatuporn Prompan, left, and Abhisit Vejjajiva (File photos)

This article is older than 60 days, which we reserve for our premium members only.You can subscribe to our premium member subscription, here.

Your comments

jgriff
Post : 402
Send message

Discussion 54 : 11 Mar 2013 at 00.2354
Post this to my Facebook
ricefield dis 49
I am not reading anything into any comment. That was a quote from Contrarian in disc 13. Please re-read it and then let Contrarian comment or do you have to handels on this site?
Like dislike 2 people liked / 11 people disliked this comment
ATNN
Post : 148
Send message

Discussion 53 : 10 Mar 2013 at 16.1253
Post this to my Facebook
Thaksin and his UDD openly, repeatedly threatened to use violence both in 2009 and 2010 before actually going ahead and using violence. You have now MP's who were on stage telling people to burn the city down, which they would go on to do - to attack soldiers, which they did. You also have verified reports by HRW that the UDD included armed professional mercenaries which would prompt deadly force from the government in ANY country. The Democrats and army must take responsibility for what exactly? Doing the best they could in response to confirmed, admitted, reckless terrorism and violence?
Like dislike 6 people liked / 13 people disliked this comment
abbub
Post : 2,030
Send message

Discussion 52 : 10 Mar 2013 at 15.2952
Post this to my Facebook
Let it be remembered...

In 2010 Abhisit hid out in military barracks. As he committed himself to being a part of the military might, and did not remain among the people, he clearly showed which camp he was in.

Once inside the barracks he was either making the decisions himself or a part of the decision-making.

Another point is, AV claims the attack against the demonstrators was necessary and unavoidable. If that were the case, and he (or they) feel justified in having been a part of that attack & dispersal...why then is it not a single one of these men stands up and says "I am responsible"?

The answer to that question is obvious.
Like dislike 15 people liked / 5 people disliked this comment
ricefield
Post : 2,378
Send message

Discussion 51 : 10 Mar 2013 at 10.2051
Post this to my Facebook
Disc 47 - Sorry airborne, I missed your question. We all know the military answers to themselves... BUT... legally they answer to Parliament. The PM has the authority to fire the Chief of the Army, probably not recommended, and with that the responsibility for any Army action lands squarely at the feet of the PM.

The legal assembly was not a court order but issued as a state of Emergency under Emergency Decree BE 2548 by the Democrat government. Read this, http://www.humanrights.asia/news/ahrc-news/AHRC-STM-143-2010 "terms of the Emergency Decree ... are clearly in breach of its provisions(the Covenant).
Like dislike 13 people liked / 9 people disliked this comment
john49
Post : 484
Send message

Discussion 50 : 10 Mar 2013 at 10.0450
Post this to my Facebook
bangmodker d22- 'Any comment on the political situation in Cambodia? Hun Sen? Sam Rainsy?
Human Rights?'

I thought you were inferring similarities between the Hun Sen regime and the Thaksin regime where democratic ideals are identical.
Like dislike 13 people liked / 11 people disliked this comment
ricefield
Post : 2,378
Send message

Discussion 49 : 10 Mar 2013 at 09.5349
Post this to my Facebook
Disc 46 - My feeling is you are reading into comment what you want to hear. No one is stating that all the deaths were protesters. There were some from the military and most of those have been accounted for as friendly fire (two friendly fire incidents are, or were, available on Utube). Unquestionably the most fatalities were from the protest group including one filmed assassination. Of those protesters shot none were found with a firearm.

We also find it unbelievable that no one has the moral backbone to take responsibility for their actions. In the Democrat camp everyone has claimed denial including the then PM.
Like dislike 15 people liked / 10 people disliked this comment
abbub
Post : 2,030
Send message

Discussion 48 : 10 Mar 2013 at 09.3148
Post this to my Facebook
BANGMOD D41: I avoided what question? Did you address a question to me personally?

About Cambodia I already answered.

If you mean the 90+ demonstrators dead...it was not I who said that.

The vast majority of dead were demonstrators. Not all.

Insinuating you are right because I personally did not respond to your comment is odd.

Anyway AV either gave the order or knows who did. They are all protecting each other!

They all claim it was necessary and justified. So why hide?
Like dislike 16 people liked / 5 people disliked this comment
airborne
Post : 336
Send message

Discussion 47 : 10 Mar 2013 at 08.3847
Post this to my Facebook
Ricefield, maybe you would like to take the time to answer my question about whether the army answers to civilians, before continuing to lay blame at Abhisit's feet. Reds demand justice but refuse to acknowledge any court ruling not in their favor such as the several proclaiming the protest to be an illegal assembly.
Like dislike 4 people liked / 12 people disliked this comment
jgriff
Post : 402
Send message

Discussion 46 : 10 Mar 2013 at 01.1646
Post this to my Facebook
"Absolutely unbelievable. That there would be those who seek to whitewash the military in the deaths of over 90 anti-coup demonstrators"

Absolutely unbelieveable. That there are still people that still think that the " over 90 " killed were ALL anti coup demonstrators.
Like dislike 7 people liked / 13 people disliked this comment
tomo
Post : 172
Send message

Discussion 45 : 10 Mar 2013 at 00.1045
Post this to my Facebook
Good on Jaturporn he was only stating facts.Afterall AV was PM.What with his Sidekick Sutep,they can answer to thier charges in COURT.
Like dislike 17 people liked / 6 people disliked this comment

1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last