Rice scheme reality dawns | Bangkok Post: opinion

Opinion > Opinion

Rice scheme reality dawns

The rice-pledging scheme is entering its second year and the government is reportedly seeking a staggering 150 billion baht loan for the cash-strapped Bank of Agriculture and Agricultural Cooperatives (BAAC) so it will be able to carry on wooing farmers' support for another year.

There is no question that farmers who have registered to take part in the scheme have benefited from it.

They could sell their crops to the millers at prices higher than the actual market prices, even though the prices they received, in most cases, were lower than the 15,000 baht/tonne for white rice and 20,000 baht/tonne for Hom Mali grains pledged by the government.

This article is older than 60 days, which we reserve for our premium members only.You can subscribe to our premium member subscription, here.

Your comments

  • Discussion 17 : 17 Jan 2013 at 22.2517

    D16 'so how can it be working other than as a vote buying scam for Thaksin/PTP ?'

    I think you just answered your own question.

  • howell

    ThailandPost : 1,680

    Send message

    Discussion 16 : 17 Jan 2013 at 21.3916

    'In other words, corruption is acceptable so long as the scheme works'.

    Works ? Exports are already down by nearly 50 % so how can it be working other than as a vote buying scam for Thaksin/PTP ?

  • Discussion 15 : 17 Jan 2013 at 20.0115

    perhaps rice can be used instead of sandbags, the next time bangkok floods!.. or perhaps the government should offer some of it to the militants in the south in exchange for them stopping killing innocent civilians - of course the real problem with these situations is that they are a massive loss of face for those in power..

  • Discussion 14 : 17 Jan 2013 at 19.4514

    Look on the bright side. When the government is finally broke and the economy collapses, the government will be able to hand out lots of free rice.

  • Discussion 13 : 17 Jan 2013 at 17.3213

    Disc11 Dougo "If I have to choose between policies which produce an oversupply of food and policies which produce a famine, I'll take the former, thank you."

    Why do you limit your choices to those two examples? Why not add a third option of a workable, non-corrupt policy? How about NO policy and letting market forces work? As far as I can see there is no-one suggesting a policy which causes a famine...

  • dao

    ThailandPost : 4,804

    Send message

    Discussion 12 : 17 Jan 2013 at 10.5212

    Propping up artificial prices for one of our main exports is financially retarded .There is no end in sight to this scheme and long goal to reach except make the farmer feel good for a couple of crops in exchange for his vote .Maybe if farmers had to pay for it they wouldn't be so enthusiastic .

  • Discussion 11 : 17 Jan 2013 at 10.0211

    If I have to choose between policies which produce an oversupply of food and policies which produce a famine, I'll take the former, thank you.

  • Ian

    Post : 937

    Send message

    Discussion 10 : 17 Jan 2013 at 09.4610

    Although I have no love for the Democrats I equally have no love for the Rice pledging scheme, it has never made sense to me. However, rather than throwing accusations around, even if true, what is needed is some way out of this mess.
    One step could be to release some of this stockpile to Thais for free or a very reduced price, to prevent this rice from entering back into the system it could be coloured with a harmless vegetable dye. Some rice could be converted to fuel or alcohol, some could be given as aid to the 3rd world.
    Even selling at a loss is better than not selling at all.

  • Discussion 9 : 17 Jan 2013 at 08.369

    Any policy/scheme/project whether big or small has challenges. They will be people who focus on problems and other who face the challenges along the path and never lose sight of the intention or goal. We need both these people. A constructive problem solver is not hard to find - it is in their presentation. A pessimist, loser, mediocre is also not difficult to spot - it is in their presentation too.

  • Discussion 8 : 17 Jan 2013 at 07.598

    These allegations of corruption do need to be more clearly backed up, but knowing this country there can be no doubt that when large amounts of money are rapidly dispersed, corruption in inevitable. PT are more interested in just getting on with it, regardless of corruption potential. To quote the author " In other words, corruption is acceptable so long as the scheme works." (That's how the last election was won!) The best way to criticise the scheme is to spell out to farmers (the voting masses) how little of the money actually ends up in their pockets. But there again, 'little' is better than nothing, besides it aint their tax money wasted

Reply

Sign in once and access every part of the website at your convenience!

Please log in to our Bangkokpost.com community to post your comment.
You can sign in to the community by clicking here.

If you are not part of the community yet, please sign up here. By being part of this community you will get all these privileges.