A call to action on climate change | Bangkok Post: opinion

Opinion > Opinion

A call to action on climate change

The latest US Federal Advisory Committee Draft Climate Assessment Report should silence climate change deniers, but, of course, it won't. The third National Climate Assessment is the work of more than 240 climate scientists and, after extensive review from the National Academies of Sciences, is awaiting submission to the federal government pending further review. The report draws mostly from studies done in the US, but since climate patterns don't respect national borders it can be assumed that its conclusions can be universally applied; as well, much of the data was compiled globally.

In its introduction the report says, "Continued warming and an increased understanding of the US temperature record, as well as multiple other sources of evidence, have strengthened our confidence in the conclusions that the warming trend is clear and primarily the result of human activities."

The report also says heavy precipitation and instances of extreme heat are increasing in a manner consistent with model projections and the risks of such extreme events will rise in the future, and calls the continuing sharp decline in summer Arctic sea ice "unprecedented" and "consistent with human-induced climate change". Other crucial findings are that the global sea level has risen by about 23cm since reliable record keeping began in 1880, and if carbon dioxide emissions stay on the same upward trajectory it is projected to rise another 0.3-1.2m. What's more, if we stay anywhere near our current emissions path, average land temperatures across the continental US are projected to rise a minimum of 5C in the later part of this century.

This article is older than 60 days, which we reserve for our premium members only.You can subscribe to our premium member subscription, here.

Your comments

  • Discussion 13 : 22 Jan 2013 at 06.1613

    (con) Here are quotes from that same petition-"There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases in causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's Climate...More over, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth."

    Besides, who can force the 2 most populous nations on Earth, India & China, both are nuclear powers, to reduce their greenhouse gases emission?

  • Discussion 12 : 22 Jan 2013 at 05.1712

    Khun Banphai #10 & #11, I can tell you for sure there is a global scientific conspiracy to suppress all scientific facts that are contrary to the "global warming" theory. Please, google "31,000 Scientists Reject 'Global Warming' Agenda." More than 31,000 (real) scientists across the US-including more than 9,000 Ph.Ds in field such as Atmospheric Science, Climatology, Earth Science, Environment, and dozens of other specialists-have signed a petition rejecting "global warming," the assumption that the human production of greenhouse gases is damaging Earth's climate. Hope this helps!

  • Discussion 11 : 21 Jan 2013 at 21.1211

    Disc 9#. Your quote is from an ill-informed article by David Rose which appeared about 12 months ago in the Daily Mail, a UK tabloid newspaper about far as removed from a respectable conveyor of science as Genghis Khan is from Mahatma Gandhi. Yes, of course, the long term 11 year solar activity cycles affect global warming, but we are already in solar down-turn and yet the underlying warming continues. This was the UK Met Office’s response to the article in the Daily mail:
    http://metofficenews.wordpress.com/2012/01/29/met-office-in-the-media-29-january-2012/
    I have yet to see the actual published report by NASA and U of Arizona. Where is

  • Discussion 10 : 21 Jan 2013 at 20.1610

    Disc 9#. Yes, I am aware of the so-called ‘climate issue’ and have been bothered to follow up on the outcomes of the investigations by the US Environmental Protection Agency, the US Department of Commerce, the Pennsylvania State University (1st panel and 2nd panel), the US National Science Foundation, the UK House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, the UK Independent Climate Change Review, and the UK International Science Assessment Panel. All of their conclusions were the same: there was no evidence of scientific fraud or misconduct.

    Comment-space limits my response: I will reply to your second assertion in a separate post

  • Discussion 9 : 21 Jan 2013 at 06.049

    Banphai #6, have you heard of "Climategate" fiasco in 2009, when "reputable" climate scientists in the UK was caught falsifying climate data in order to keep the "warming" going despite of the fact that it had come to an end in 1997? Then scientists at NASA and U of Arizona issued their findings that the last global warming cycle #24 was over, and the earth is now entering a new global cooling cycle #25. They warned of cold summer, bitter winter and shortening of growing season. Please, google "Forget about global warming-it's Cycle 25 we need to worry about (and if NASA scientists are right the Thames will be freezing over again)."

  • Discussion 8 : 20 Jan 2013 at 21.028

    Disc 2# and 4#. Actually, it is very well documented and accepted by all national and major scientific institutions worldwide that the sudden rise in global temperatures since the beginning of the 20th century is unprecedented, that the rise has nothing whatsoever to with fluctuations in solar radiation and cannot possibly be explained by volcanic eruptions, and that the only tenable current explanation is the man-made production of greenhouse gases.

  • Discussion 7 : 20 Jan 2013 at 17.107

    Khun Sanam-bin #3, it is well documented that volcanic eruptions actually lower the earth temperature, instead of raising it. A good example is the eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines in 1991, which lowered the global temperature by 0.9 deg-F, which lasted for several years. The 1991's Mount Pinatubo's eruption released about 10,000,000,000 tonnes of magma, and 20,000,000 tonnes of SO-2. So, what kind of human activities do you think are capable of releasing that much pollution into the earth's atmosphere in such a short period of time? That's why I said we still have no clues of how the earth's climate mechanism work!

  • Discussion 6 : 20 Jan 2013 at 14.406

    The mechanism of climate change is well understood, both past and present. Carbon dioxide levels are the thermostat of the Earth's temperature. Past climate change was triggered by emission of carbon dioxide from volcanos, the result of tectonic activity. Current carbon dioxide emissions are caused by burning fossil fuels. Each year the human race is burning 4 cubic kilometres of oil, plus several cubic kilometres of gas and coal. An increase in carbon dioxide levels of only one part per million is enough to affect the Earth's temperature. There is no controversy. Read some science on the subject.

  • Discussion 5 : 20 Jan 2013 at 08.575

    Anyone who wants to know the truth about global warming and climate change, please, google "Forget global warming-it's Cycle 25 we need to worry about (and if NASA scientists are right the Thames will be freezing over again)."

  • Discussion 4 : 20 Jan 2013 at 08.464

    Angkor declined because it's water technology, which was excellent, could not meet the demands of a growing population.

Reply

Sign in once and access every part of the website at your convenience!

Please log in to our Bangkokpost.com community to post your comment.
You can sign in to the community by clicking here.

If you are not part of the community yet, please sign up here. By being part of this community you will get all these privileges.