Vote to make a difference | Bangkok Post: opinion

Opinion > Opinion

Vote to make a difference

When a reporter approached a vendor this week and asked for her views on the Bangkok governor election, she responded by saying she wasn't expecting anything to change and was fed up with the topic. While such feelings are understandable given the lack of charisma and exaggerated policy platforms of most of the candidates, eligible voters must turn out in force at the polls tomorrow if there is to be a meaningful result. Yes, it can be a tough choice for those not voting along party lines but democracy has always been about challenge and the issues in municipal elections rarely change.

Futuristic and idealistic schemes involving extensive use of modern technology are all well and good. They provide the "wow" factor in the campaign. But it is the less glamorous issues that usually decide the outcome. These include such down to earth concerns as keeping the traffic flowing, better air quality, control of petty crime, alleviation of poverty in deprived communities, food hygiene at roadside vendor stalls, successful flood prevention measures, increasing the number of parks, improving the quality of municipal schools and health stations, coping with increasing amounts of garbage, preparing for integration into the Asean Economic Community and fixing the footpaths so pedestrians don't sprain their ankles or fall down holes while walking through business, tourist or residential areas.

Grabbing most of the attention have been the two front-runners, Sukhumbhand Paribatra and Pongsapat Pongcharoen, backed by the Democrat and Pheu Thai parties. Independent candidates Sereepisuth Temiyavej, Kosit Suvinijjit and Suharit Siamwalla have also garnered attention. And, while no one has been unfortunate enough to fall in a khlong this time, respect is due independent candidate Sopon Pornchokchai, 72, who swam across the Chao Phraya River to promote his campaign to raise awareness about river conservation.

This article is older than 60 days, which we reserve for our premium members only.You can subscribe to our premium member subscription, here.

Your comments

  • Discussion 11 : 03 Mar 2013 at 00.1811

    "And, while no one has been unfortunate enough to fall in a khlong this time..." A shame she isn't running this time. She was a fun candidate.

  • Discussion 10 : 02 Mar 2013 at 20.1810

    Very simple, if after 4 years the worker is still lazy and useless as first day, FIRE him!

  • Discussion 9 : 02 Mar 2013 at 18.189

    we ..and the media should help hold these candidates accountable to what they have promised.

  • Discussion 8 : 02 Mar 2013 at 12.448

    Discussion 2 "What message would politicians get if an election were held and NO ONE voted?"
    The message they would get is that no one cares and they have a free reign to do what they wanted. If you do not vote you have no right to complain about what is happening in the country.

  • Discussion 7 : 02 Mar 2013 at 12.007

    None of the five major pollsters have either independent candidates or Sukhumbhand win the election. The opinion polls lost their credibility because the losers have to play dirty in finding excuses.

  • Discussion 6 : 02 Mar 2013 at 10.136

    Just remember the big excuse for whoever steps into office is....The budget for this year has already been allotted..or spent..."Next year I will start my plans!"

  • Discussion 5 : 02 Mar 2013 at 09.165

    Bedouin 2: Because you can ! There are many who die to have the right to vote. You take it as a given right and for you it is. Think if you didn't have that right. Sooooo high sounding maybe but true.

  • Discussion 4 : 02 Mar 2013 at 09.124

    "Vote to make a difference"...in Thailand, what a joke!

  • Discussion 3 : 02 Mar 2013 at 08.593

    This is the battle between good and evil...between the massive propaganda campaign sponsored from abroad, full of the usual hollow promises and on the other side respect for the law, and respect for the hard working , tax paying citizen.....And those are facts only!

  • Discussion 2 : 02 Mar 2013 at 08.352

    Editorials like this occur before all and every election in America. They are sooooo high sounding. But should one vote when they do not like or trust any of the candidates; or feel that any measurable change will take place no matter who wins? A true story: one American state used to have a column in each section of offices that said, "None of the above." Once that column got more votes than any of the candidates. Embarrassed, the legislators removed it by law from any subsequent ballots.
    What message would politicians get if an election were held and NO ONE voted?

    Why should any of us mark a ballot for the lesser of the evils offered?

Reply

Sign in once and access every part of the website at your convenience!

Please log in to our Bangkokpost.com community to post your comment.
You can sign in to the community by clicking here.

If you are not part of the community yet, please sign up here. By being part of this community you will get all these privileges.